Both of These Out of Position Strategies Are Wrong
- 44 minutes ago
- 3 min read
When you’re the preflop raiser and end up playing out of position, there’s a good chance you’re doing one of two things:
1) You’re c-betting way too much
or
2) You’re checking way too much
And both are leaks.
The problem isn’t aggression.
The problem isn’t passivity either.
The real problem is thinking about out of position as one strategy.
Because it isn’t.
Some OOP spots are fantastic for you.
Some are terrible.
And most sit somewhere in the middle.
Today I’m going to show you a simple way to think about these spots so you know:
when to bet
when to check
and most importantly… why
Let’s dive in.
Prefer to watch? I break it all down in this video:
1: Understand who has the advantages
When you raise from the CO and the BB calls, you should c-bet a lot.
Why?
Because you usually have all 3 advantages:
Position
Equity
Nut advantage
That’s a green light for aggression.
But now let’s change one thing…
You open the CO again…
…but this time the BTN calls.
Suddenly:
you lose position
equities run much closer together
you lose nut advantage more often
Now you need to check much more.
Same stack depth.
Same preflop raiser.
Completely different strategy.
That’s the key lesson:
OOP isn’t one strategy.
It depends who has more of the advantages.
2: Not all OOP spots are created equal
Now let’s make it more interesting.
You open from EP…
…the BTN calls…
You’re still out of position.
But now your opening range is much stronger.
That means you regain some advantages:
✅ More equity
✅ More nut advantage
And suddenly…
…you can start c-betting much more aggressively again.
That’s why:
CO vs BTN = check-heavy
LJ vs BTN = much more mixed
EP vs BTN = much more betting
Same spot type.
Very different strategy.
3: Here’s where players get into trouble
Take this flop:
CO vs BTN – J♣ 3♦ 2♣
Most players bet:
Jx
overpairs
sets
Because betting feels natural.
But this is actually a pure check.
Why?
Because:
you’re out of position
you’re at an equity disadvantage
BTN has nut advantage
You’re betting into a range that’s stronger than you think.
That’s a leak.
Now compare that to:
EP vs BTN – A♠ J♦ 6♣ rainbow
This is a pure bet.
You have:
equity advantage
nut advantage
That’s enough to bet aggressively.
Same position (OOP).
Completely different answer.
4: Strong-looking boards can still be checks
Here’s a board that blows most players’ minds:
CO vs BTN – K♣ Q♣ T♦
At first glance it looks amazing for CO.
You have:
straights
sets
two pair
loads of strong top pairs
So betting feels obvious.
But this is actually a high-frequency check.
Why?
Because while your range still looks strong:
equities run close together
BTN has nut advantage
BTN has loads of easy continues
They have:
more straights
more two pair
loads of Jx with open-ended straight draws
So your c-bet loses a lot of power.
Again:
The right question isn’t:
“Do I have a strong hand?”
The right question is:
“Who has more of the advantages?”
5: Use aggregate reports to build heuristics
This is where strategy starts to click.
Instead of studying individual flops…
…start looking for patterns.
For example, at 30bb:
CO vs BTN
Checks 71%
LJ vs BTN
Checks 50%
EP vs BTN
Checks 37%
Huge difference.
And it’s all explained by range strength and advantages.
You can go deeper by filtering:
board type
high card
texture
Then patterns start jumping out:
9-high boards bet more
J-high boards check more
Monotone boards check more
Stronger opening ranges allow more aggression
That’s how you build heuristics.
That’s how strategy transfers in-game.
That’s how you stop guessing.
Free aggregate reports
To help you study this properly, I’ve put together interactive aggregate reports for:
✅ 30bb CO vs BTN
✅ 30bb LJ vs BTN
✅ 30bb EP vs BTN
You can filter by:
board type
high card
texture
…and start building your own overarching strategy for these spots.
Today’s action tip
Look at your flop c-bet stat when you’re OOP as the preflop raiser.
If it’s very high…
…you may be over-c-betting.
If it’s very low…
…you may be checking too much.
The goal isn’t aggressive.
The goal isn’t passive.
The goal is understanding who has more of the advantages.
